Last updated: 29 September 2026
Reading time: 7 minutes
Prepared by: Basta Vape Editorial Team
“Popcorn lung” is often mentioned in discussions about vaping, although the story began among food-flavouring workers. Which chemical raised concern, and does its detection in some older products mean it is present in every product today?
This article separates scientific findings, market-specific rules and reasonable economic inferences about authentic and counterfeit products.
Short answer
The chemical: diacetyl, associated with inhalation of butter-flavouring vapours in occupational settings.
Vaping products: diacetyl was detected in some products, and vaping-associated constrictive bronchiolitis has been reported; these reports do not identify a specific causal chemical or establish population incidence.
Authenticity: a brand verification code can help establish a package’s origin when checked through the brand’s official channel. It is not a chemical analysis.
What is popcorn lung and what are its symptoms?
Bronchiolitis obliterans, also called constrictive bronchiolitis, affects the small airways, causing scarring and narrowing that may be permanent. Diacetyl is not its only cause; other settings include some infections, immune-related disease and transplant complications.
Possible symptoms include persistent dry cough, breathlessness especially with exertion, wheezing and fatigue. Cleveland Clinic explains that these overlap with other conditions. Neither coughing nor a history of vaping establishes the diagnosis; assessment may include lung-function tests, imaging and other clinician-selected investigations.
Persistent or worsening symptoms warrant medical assessment. Treatment may relieve symptoms and slow damage, but established scarring may not resolve.
Cough, breathlessness and wheezing overlap with other conditions; neither an image nor symptoms alone establishes the diagnosis.
Where did “popcorn lung” get its name?
In 2000, NIOSH was asked to investigate obliterative bronchiolitis in former workers at a microwave-popcorn plant. Research pointed to inhaled butter-flavouring vapours at work. The popular name refers to the workplace, not to eating popcorn.
Diacetyl gives some flavourings a buttery note. A substance used in food is not automatically safe to inhale, while occupational and consumer exposures can differ in concentration, duration and route.
Food use does not establish inhalation safety; route of exposure and dose matter.
Was diacetyl found in vaping products?
Yes. A study in Environmental Health Perspectives tested emissions from 51 flavoured e-cigarette products and detected diacetyl in 39. Detection was not limited to butter-labelled flavours.
This describes a particular sample at a particular time. It cannot establish the composition of every brand or batch today, nor the cause of an individual illness.
What has been shown in people who vape?
Evidence extends beyond the 2019 report. A 2022 NEJM Evidence case series described four patients with a history of e-cigarette use and biopsy findings of small-airway fibrosis and constrictive bronchiolitis. After assessing alternative causes, the authors considered e-cigarette use the most likely cause.
A 2024 clinical report also described vaping-associated constrictive bronchiolitis based on clinical findings, lung-function testing, imaging and assessment of other causes. Small airways were absent from that patient’s biopsy sample, which limits pathological confirmation in this case.
These clinical reports merit attention, but they cannot estimate population incidence or establish diacetyl as the specific causal agent in those cases. It would be inaccurate either to dismiss the published cases or to generalize the outcome to every user or product.
The 2019 EVALI outbreak is distinct. CDC findings strongly linked the outbreak to vitamin E acetate in some THC products. This does not identify the cause of every vaping-associated lung illness.
Is diacetyl prohibited everywhere?
In Great Britain, MHRA ingredient guidance lists diacetyl and 2,3-pentanedione among substances not permitted as ingredients in e-liquids. UK rules also require product notification before sale.
Requirements vary by market. The published English translation of Saudi regulation SFDA.FD 5005:2020 sets ingredient and purity requirements but does not name diacetyl explicitly. The UK ingredient rule should therefore not be presented as identical Saudi wording.
How do authenticity and reputation change the picture?
An established company has an economic incentive to protect its reputation. Recalls, regulatory consequences and lost trust can be costly, giving it reasons to manage suppliers, formulations and production. Profit incentives can also encourage cost cutting. Effective oversight and accountability influence actual behaviour, so reputation remains an economic consideration rather than a laboratory finding.
A counterfeit package appropriates another brand’s identity, making its true maker and contents harder to trace. An authentic, traceable product provides a clearer line to the brand, distribution channel and batch. Neither fact proves that every authentic product is safe or that every counterfeit contains diacetyl.
What does an authenticity code actually establish?
When checked through a brand’s official channel, a valid code may support a claim that a package comes from that brand. Check the official website independently rather than relying only on an unknown link printed on packaging; retain the batch details and seller information.
A verification code does not measure ingredients. Evidence for a particular batch requires reliable formulation information or appropriate independent testing linked to that batch. “Counterfeit” and “unauthorized in a particular market” also mean different things.
An illustration of laboratory testing: authenticity codes do not analyse ingredients, and this image is not a test result for a particular product.
Does absence of diacetyl establish overall safety?
Even an appropriate test reporting no detectable diacetyl applies to the tested sample and the method’s detection limit. It does not establish that the product or its emissions are free of all other risks.
Frequently asked questions
Does every buttery flavour contain diacetyl?
A flavour name or smell cannot answer that. Consult product-specific data or suitable analysis.
Is every authentic product free of it?
Authenticity does not establish chemical content. Composition can vary by product, batch and market.
Does every counterfeit contain it?
No such conclusion follows. Unknown origin raises uncertainty; confirming a chemical requires testing.
Is a verification code a safety certificate?
No. It helps check provenance, not the ingredients or emissions.
Are EVALI and popcorn lung the same condition?
No. They involve different clinical contexts, and EVALI findings cannot prove diacetyl caused obliterative bronchiolitis.
Summary
The occupational evidence establishes concern about inhaled butter-flavouring vapours, and diacetyl was detected in some earlier vaping products. Some markets prohibit its addition to e-liquids. Those facts cannot certify every brand or identify the cause of every lung illness.
Authenticity, traceability and accountability help distinguish original goods from counterfeits. When the question concerns one chemical in one product, formulation evidence and batch-relevant analysis remain the appropriate tests.
Sources
- CDC/NIOSH
- Allen et al., Environmental Health Perspectives (2016)
- UK MHRA ingredient guidance
- UK MHRA product notification rules
- Landman et al., CMAJ (2019)
- CDC: EVALI and vitamin E acetate
- Saudi SFDA.FD 5005:2020
- Hariri et al., NEJM Evidence (2022)
- Carey et al., Respiratory Medicine Case Reports (2024)
- Cleveland Clinic: bronchiolitis obliterans